1. Why does a highly educated immigrant deliver a high impact on the fiscal picture of U.S?
2. Why does Buchholz take Andy Grove for example in his book?
3. Since unskilled immigrants drive down wages for existing citizens in U.S., why have the wages for high-skilled immigrants in Canada also declined slightly?
4. Does the author agree with Alan Greenspan's opinion about depressing the wages paid to professionals?
5. Do you think the immigration policy of Canada is better than that in U.S.?
6. If you have an opportunity to immigrate to one country, you would like to choose U.S. or Canada?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
1. Because he or she pays taxes but does not consume entitlement dollars disbursed by the state "for their birth, early health care or schooling. Moreover, they create jobs.
2. Andy Grove helped build Intel into a world leader in the semiconductor industry. "If not for Andy Grove," Buchholz notes, "there might not be an INTEL INSIDE sticker on your computer, and America's dominance of advanced semiconductors might have flickered and displayed a FATAL ERROR message."
3. Because of the greater supply of high-skilled workers, but the immigration of such workers to Canada has not hurt the middle class worker at all. In fact, "Low-skilled workers in Canada have also gained relative to high-skilled workers," the report found, reducing income inequality north of the border.
4. The author doesn’t agree.
5. I think immigration policy of the USA is better than Canada.
6. I have already immigrated to the USA. I think if I retire, to become a Canadian citizen is better tha
1. Why does a highly educated immigrant deliver a high impact on the fiscal picture of U.S?
They pay taxes and they create jobs
2. Why does Buchholz take Andy Grove for example in his book?
Because, Andy Grove, helped build Intel into a world leader in the semiconductor industry and is a good example of the contribution that skilled immigrants give to the society of USA.
3. Since unskilled immigrants drive down wages for existing citizens in U.S., why have the wages for high-skilled immigrants in Canada also declined slightly?
Because of the greater supply of high-skilled workers.
4. Does the author agree with Alan Greenspan's opinion about depressing the wages paid to professionals?
No he is not agree with the opinion of Alan Greenspan, who said we should "open up a significant window for skilled workers" in order to depress wages paid to professionals. In the opinion of the author this assessments go too far.
5. Do you think the immigration policy of Canada is better than that in U.S.?
I don’t to much about immigration policy, but I think that if people who is highly skilled and educated is going to Canada is because the immigrations policies are better than in United States.
6. If you have an opportunity to immigrate to one country, you would like to choose U.S. or Canada?
No, any of them because I love my country and I love my culture, so I don’t want to live in a foreign country. It is not attractive to me live in one of this countries.
1- Because he or she pays taxes but does not consume entitlement dollars disbursed by the state "for their birth, early health care or schooling." Moreover, they create jobs.
2-To support his argument.
3-Because of the greater supply of high-skilled workers, but the immigration of such workers to Canada has not hurt the middle class worker at all.
4-No, he doesn't.
5-I think as i heard, canada is better but i amn't familier with theses policies and i don't see any problems here in US for the immigrants.
6- For me, niether one. Becuase i tried to live outside of my country and realized that it isn't good idea to leave my home for any reason.
1. Because educated immigrants pay taxes but do not consume entitlement dollars disbursed by the state.
2. Because he helped build Intel into a world leader in the semiconductor industry and also and without his help might not be an INTEL INSIDE sticker on one computer.
3. Because significantly higher proportion of immigrants to Canada than the U.S. are highly educated.
4. no, he said Alan Greenspan goes to far.
5. I don’t know so much about Canadian or US immigration police; however, when high educated people come to a country they improve the quality of life of the city because they create more jobs and pay taxes. But, I am not telling that less educated immigrant are not desired, it is just that they, even are good people, use taxes of the city for long time before being productive. According to the article maybe, if you are a immigrant the US policy is better than Canadian, but US policy is not better than Canadian if you are a native citizen.
6. I think that US is better, because one has the opportunity to work and be successful. Also because here one has more freedom. However, one should chose a good city with a great quantity of high educated people.
1. Because he or she pays taxes but does not consume entitlement dollars disbursed by the state "for their birth, early health care or schooling." Moreover, they create jobs.
2. Because, Andy Grove, helped build Intel into a world leader in the semiconductor industry and is a good example of the contribution that skilled immigrants give to the society of USA.
3. Because a significantly higher proportion of immigrants to Canada than the U.S. are highly educated.
4. No.
5. Yes. Compared to the U.S., the policy of Canada has less possibily to create conflict, to have high-skilled Cnanadian workers, and to make gap-widening society.
6. I think I will definitely choose Canada, because Canada is safer and more comfortable to live in.
1. Because he or she pays taxes but does not consume entitlement dollars disbursed by the state "for their birth, early health care or schooling." Moreover, they create jobs.
2. Because he helped build Intel into a world leader in the semiconductor industry and also and without his help might not be an INTEL INSIDE sticker on one computer.
3. Because a significantly higher proportion of immigrants to Canada than the U.S. are highly educated.
4. No. The author doesn’t agree.
5. Yes, I think so.
6. I will chose USA.
1. Educated immigrant who shows up on our shores delivers a +$198,000 impact on our fiscal picture" because he or she pays taxes but does not consume entitlement dollars disbursed by the state "for their birth, early health care or schooling."
2.To support his idea that educated immigrants are more entrepreneurial and far more likely to create new jobs that cost old ones.
3.A significantly higher proportion of immigrants to Canada than the U.S. are highly educated.
4.The author disagreed.
5.I think the immigration policy of US is better.
6.I am not sure but I will choose US because I want to study in US not Canada.
1. Because they pay taxes but do not consume entitlement dollars disbursed by the state.
2. Because Andy Grove helped build intel into a world leader in the semiconductor industry, and it is a good example of the contribution that skilled immigrants give to the society of USA.
3. Because a significantly higher proportion of immigrants to Canada than the U.S. are highly educated.
4. No, he doesn't agree.
5. I think immigration policy of the Canada is better than US because its policy has less possibily to create conflict.
6. Even if I have an opportunity to immigrate to one of the two countries, I would not immigrate to any country. I prefer to live in Korea, even I love the natural environment of these countries; however, if I should immigrant, I prefer the U.S. because I expect the U.S. could give me better academic environment and opportunities to reserch as a scolar than Canada.
1. Because he or she pays taxes but does not consume entitlement dollars disbursed by the state "for their birth, early health care or schooling. Moreover, they create jobs.
2.the example support his arguement--high educated immigrants create jobs.
3. Because of the greater supply of high-skilled workers.
4. The author doesn’t agree.
5.I don't know much about immigration policy.But according to the article, maybe Canadian policy is better.
6.USA is better for work, but Canada is better for living.
6.
1. Because they dropp much money in US such as a tax, or as a entrepreneur.
2. Because he is a example of "educated immigrants are more entrepreneurial and far more likely to create new jobs that cost old ones."
3. Because of the greater supply of high-skilled workers, but the immigration of such workers to Canada has not hurt the middle class worker at all. In fact, "Low-skilled workers in Canada have also gained relative to high-skilled workers," the report found, reducing income inequality north of the border.
4. No.
5. I think US policy is better, because it can wecome people all over the world.
6. I will choose the US. Just because I am not familiar with Canada. I think for me (Japanese) there are no big difference between Canada and the US. So, for me, it`t just up to my favor.
Post a Comment